New ICE Policy Ends Bond Hearings for Migrants—What This Means for Immigrants in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York

Jul 15

Update, August 29, 2026: The policy described below has been rejected by the federal appeals court that governs Pennsylvania and New Jersey. In Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, Nos. 26-1150 and 26-1454 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2026) (precedential), the Third Circuit held that a person who entered without inspection and was later arrested inside the United States is detained under INA 236(a), not INA 235(b)(2)(A), and may ask an immigration judge for bond. That decision joins the Second Circuit (Barbosa da Cunha v. Freden, Apr. 28, 2026, covering New York) and six other circuits, while the Fifth Circuit (Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, Feb. 6, 2026) and Eighth Circuit have upheld the policy and petitions for certiorari are pending at the Supreme Court. In our region, people arrested in the interior after entering without inspection can once again ask an immigration judge for bond, though release is never guaranteed and the law may change again.

A new federal immigration policy is making headlines—and causing alarm for immigration lawyers and families across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. The U.S. government has quietly implemented a directive eliminating bond hearings for immigrants who enter the country without authorization. This means that thousands of migrants, including asylum seekers and long-term residents, may now be detained indefinitely without the opportunity to appear before an immigration judge to request release.

As immigration attorneys serving clients in PA, NJ, and NY, we believe it is critical for the public to understand how this policy change affects individuals and families in our communities. For decades, individuals in immigration detention have had the right to request a bond hearing to argue that they are neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. These hearings were often the only avenue for release during the lengthy immigration court process. Now, that safeguard has been effectively removed.

This policy shift directly impacts immigrants detained in facilities across Pennsylvania, such as the Moshannon Valley Processing Center and the Pike County Correctional Facility, as well as in New Jersey at the Elizabeth Detention Center and Bergen County Jail. In New York, the fallout will be felt by individuals detained upstate or held in county jails under contract with ICE. Without the option for a bond hearing, individuals face weeks or months—or longer—of incarceration while they await a decision in their immigration case.

The government has also significantly expanded its detention capacity, increasing available beds from 58,000 to nearly 100,000. This signals a return to mass detention, where ICE aims to hold as many individuals as possible, regardless of whether they pose a threat or have strong ties to the community. Immigration lawyers in New Jersey and New York are already seeing clients denied even the opportunity to present evidence or request release.

This dramatic expansion of immigration detention will place enormous pressure on families across the tri-state area. Parents may be separated from their children, workers removed from their jobs, and individuals with pending asylum or green card applications will be forced to fight their cases from inside a detention center. For immigrants in Pennsylvania and throughout the region, this policy turns the presumption of liberty on its head.

Is a family member being held by ICE without a bond hearing?

The July 2025 no-bond policy has now been rejected by the Third Circuit for Pennsylvania and New Jersey. We move quickly on bond motions, parole requests, and habeas petitions for families in the Lehigh Valley.

Talk to a Removal Defense Attorney

Or call (484) 763-4984

From a legal standpoint, the change undermines core constitutional principles. Even in immigration law—where the government has broad authority—there are basic due process protections. Detaining individuals without the ability to seek release from an immigration judge challenges those protections and is likely to face legal opposition in the near future.

As immigration attorneys based in Pennsylvania and representing clients across New Jersey and New York, we are already taking steps to challenge the consequences of this policy. In some cases, we are pursuing parole requests. In others, we are preparing habeas corpus petitions in federal court to challenge unlawful detention. We are also advising families and employers on how to prepare for possible enforcement actions and how to protect the rights of their loved ones.

For those seeking an immigration lawyer in Allentown, Philadelphia, or Pittsburgh, or if you need a bond attorney in Newark or New York City, now is the time to act. If you or someone you know has been detained by ICE, you must speak with an experienced immigration lawyer who understands the complex interplay between detention, bond, and due process. The rules are changing fast, and your rights may depend on quick and strategic action.

This policy change also places a spotlight on the importance of early legal representation. If you are planning to file for asylum, adjustment of status, or have a pending immigration court hearing, don’t wait until detention becomes a risk. A proactive approach with the guidance of a trusted immigration attorney in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, or New York can make all the difference.

As this new policy unfolds, we remain committed to defending the rights of immigrants in our region. We believe that no one should be jailed indefinitely without a chance to be heard. Whether you’re seeking release from ICE custody or need help preparing your immigration case, our office stands ready to fight for you.

Are you or a loved one facing immigration detention in PA, NJ, or NY?

Contact our office today to schedule a consultation with a knowledgeable immigration attorney who can help you understand your options and protect your future.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the July 2025 ICE policy still block bond hearings in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York?

Not as of August 2026. The Third Circuit, which covers Pennsylvania and New Jersey, held on August 28, 2026 in Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC that people who entered without inspection and were arrested inside the country are detained under INA 236(a) and may ask an immigration judge for bond. The Second Circuit reached the same result for New York in Barbosa da Cunha v. Freden on April 28, 2026. DHS may still argue otherwise, and the Supreme Court could take the question up.

What did the policy actually say?

ICE's July 8, 2025 interim guidance told officers to treat anyone who entered without inspection, however long ago, as an applicant for admission subject to mandatory detention under INA 235(b)(2)(A), with release only through DHS parole. The BIA adopted that reading in Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025). Eight courts of appeals have since rejected it, the Fifth and Eighth Circuits have accepted it, and petitions asking the Supreme Court to resolve the split are pending.

Who is eligible for immigration bond in 2026?

A person held under INA 236(a) who is not subject to mandatory detention under INA 236(c) for certain criminal or terrorism grounds, is not an arriving alien in expedited removal, and is not under a final removal order. In the Third and Second Circuits that now includes most people arrested in the interior after entering without inspection. A right to a hearing is not a right to release: the person must still show they are neither a danger nor a flight risk.

My relative was moved to Texas or Louisiana. Does the Third Circuit ruling still help?

It may not. Bond and habeas law follow the circuit where the person is detained, and the Fifth Circuit (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi) upheld mandatory detention in Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi on February 6, 2026. Transfers out of our region are common. Tell counsel the moment someone is moved, because a habeas petition filed before transfer can sometimes keep the case in the more favorable court. Use the ICE Online Detainee Locator to track the location.

What can a family do right now?

Find out where the person is held and under what authority, then gather proof of address, family ties, work history, tax filings, and any pending application. Depending on the facility, the options are a bond motion before the immigration judge, a parole request to ICE under 8 CFR 212.5, or a habeas corpus petition in federal court. Contact a removal defense attorney quickly; release is never guaranteed, and eligibility should be confirmed against the law on the day of the hearing.

Alex Short http://www.lehighvalleyimmigrationlawyers.com/